How ABC and Disney Spoiled “Wall-E” For The Entire World

Last night, I was watching Game 3 of the NBA Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Boston Celtics, and during one of the time outs ABC turned their cameras to show the Celebrities in the audience at the Staples Center, one of the inevitable and annoying trends of the past couple of decades.

Naturally, ABC was running through all of the usual Celebrity suspects: there was Jack, flanked as always by Lou Adler and a young chick; Dustin Hoffman; Spike Lee, etc. Suddenly, out of the blue, there was an interview or something with Wall-E, the robot subject of the latest movie by Pixar.

And all I could think was “Gee, thanks for spoiling the movie for me!”

I don’t exactly remember when I first started noticing the annoying Celebrity shots while watching sporting events, but my guess is that like so many annoying sports broadcasting trends, it started with the FOX World Series broadcasts. You know, the ones where they treat the actual Baseball part of the broadcast with the same grudging respect teenagers give their grandparents.

Because the World Series happens during the beginning of the Fall TV season, FOX always uses it as a method for hyping upcoming shows, and so not only are we treated to thousands of promos for those shows during every commercial break (just as ABC is currently doing for their doomed Life on Mars remake), we are also treated to live shots of the actual actors of those shows at the games — always treated as if they just happened to be lifelong fans of the teams in the Series, and taking seats from actual fans of those teams in order to whore out their latest project.

It’s actually a pretty good indicator of which shows FOX thinks will break out to their audience, so the Save Dollhouse! people better cross their fingers for loads of shots of Eliza Dushku and Tahmoh Penikett, the way we’ve been previously subjected to Hugh Laurie — no doubt a lifelong Colorado Rockies fan — and the guys in Fastlane, whose names I can no longer remember or even bother to IMDB.

Naturally, as awful the marketing department of FOX is, they don’t even come close to the evil geniuses who market for Disney, for whom I have such a life-long antipathy that when I brought the subject up last night during the actual telecast, Rox went “Disney marketing department blah blah blah,” before I could even get a full sentence out. Luckily, you fine people haven’t been around me for the past two decades, so I’ll just complain this way.

The reasons for that antipathy go back to how they marketed their videos back when I managed the Video Zone in Clovis in the late 1980s. It’s a policy of creating demand by artificially reducing the supply, which meant that they released their classic movies on VHS (and Beta!) for approximately 15 minutes, after which they seemingly made every single copy on Earth self-destruct.

The upshot of Disney’s policy was that in the late 80s and early 90s, any retailer that either sold or rented Disney Videos (because even the rental copies tended to be disappear) to the general public spent all their time explaining why the 1001 copies of 101 Dalmatians that were for sale last month when the are now gone, and why the customer is shit out of luck because it won’t be released again in any format until 2008.

Detail of “The Little Mermaid” VHS box coverIt’s a neat marketing trick, but that the customers didn’t really understand all that much, and, naturally always blamed the retailers (“surely, you have one more copy in the back”) for the artificial shortage created by Disney. Which was why I took special pleasure when one of their disgruntled artists snuck a huge penis onto the VHS box cover of the Little Mermaid, still one of the all-time greatest acts of entertainment industry rebellion.

Unless, of course, it was accidental, as Snopes claims. Either way, it was funny, and there was definitely enough egg (as the kids called it back then) on Disney’s face for the box cover to be castrated for future pressings.

Right. Where was I, again? Oh right, the ritual Running of the Celebrities, because of which, I just realized that perhaps the NBA Finals Conspiracy people have it totally wrong. I mean, if you’re ABC, and you’re working with the National Basketball Association hand-in-hand to choreograph every single shot so as to get maximum viewerage for your network, why wouldn’t you want the San Antonio Spurs in the NBA Finals so that you can show Desperate Housewives star Eva Longoria Parker every 35 seconds?

Oh look, there’s Eva Longoria Parker happy! Oh look, there’s Eva Longoria Parker angry! Oh look, there’s Eva Longoria Parker worried! Oh look, there’s Eva Longoria Parker talking on her cell phone! Wait! Where’s Eva Longoria Parker! She must be in the restroom, don’t worry, our cameras will follow her! Sure, Lakers-Celtics has the historical value, but there just aren’t any Laker fans with that perfect combination of high-profile and high-rated ABC series. Unless, of course, ABC isn’t part of the Conspiracy.

They are, however, part of Disney, as is Pixar, which is why Wall-E gets highlighted in the same break as Jack Nicholson and Dustin Hoffman.

I haven’t really been paying that much attention to the promotion for Wall-E, just assuming that if it was from Pixar, it would be worth my while. Oh, and thinking that Wall-E himself kinda looked like a squat Number 5 from Short Circuit.

But here’s the thing: showing Wall-E at the NBA Finals is 100% a spoiler for the movie Wall-E. Why? Because it occurs after the events of the movie on Wall-E’s personal timeline.

No matter what emotional trials Wall-E faces; no matter how much mental anguish Wall-E goes through; no matter what physical dangers Wall-E faces, we now know that he’s going to be OK.

In fact, better than OK, because Wall-E is getting to hang out as a Celebrity at the 2008 NBA Finals. Is your life going so well that you get to hang out as a Celebrity at the 2008 NBA Finals? So now that we know that Wall-E ends up with a better life than all of the rest of us, why go see the movie? In fact, it might even be depressing to see all of that other stuff that happens in the movie, now that we know that Wall-E is kicking so much ass in his personal life.

Hey ABC and Disney! Did you think we wouldn’t notice this fatal flaw in your relentless pursuit of synergistic perfection? So arrogant.

Because it’s not just me who got spoiled, but the entire world-wide audience for the NBA Finals. An audience which might have wanted to go see Wall-E, but might just not bother now that they know that he’s going to turn out OK. And since Wall-E — who was probably railroaded into making the appearance in the first place — no doubt gets some of the back end, that’s going to affect his cut.

Just wait until the rest of the Robots — who I’m sure were anxiously waiting for the Opening Week numbers to prove that one of their kind could carry a movie — hear about this. They’re going to be so pissed that they’ll move the Revolution up a couple of decades.

So on behalf of not just myself, but the entire world I just want to say this to the marketing people at Disney: “Thanks a lot. Not just for spoiling Wall-E, but putting the entire fate of humanity at risk!”

Luckily, there’s a special circle in Hell reserved just for them.

9 Responses to “How ABC and Disney Spoiled “Wall-E” For The Entire World”

  1. Ihateyou says:

    Moron, stfu and do somthing else

  2. Jim says:

    You mean, like, learn how to spell “something”?

    On it!!

  3. JohnR says:

    David Stern should let Wall-E referee game 7. The NBA could be infused with some much needed creditability.

  4. confusedinconnecticut says:

    But, the events in the movie Wall-E take place in the future…

    Couldn’t he attend the present sporting event and still be around for the events in 2012 or whenever it is?

  5. Jim says:


    Confused, I was wondering when somebody would point that out.

    Remembering that (as The Doctor once pointed out) time is made up of of a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff, it’s obvious that:

    1) The reason that Wall-E is a Celebrity is that he has a movie coming out.
    2) While the events of the movie take place in our future, they clearly take place in Wall-E’s personal past, otherwise there would be no plot for the move.
    3) It’s obvious that Wall-E is a time traveler, just now visiting 2008 for the first time — because otherwise, the movie would have already been made.

  6. demopublican says:

    Geez, Wall-e is a Pixar movie, i.e. it’s animated.

    The real wall-e is a real robot–to the promote the movie. This is the 1st time pixar has used a real, working thing to promote their movie, not just some actor or directory which is <50% of a animated character.

  7. WOW says:

    You have no life. Also, you need to check your work before you publish it. There are so many grammatical errors that it makes you look like more of an idiot. Another thing, you see actors from movies, that have died in the movie, out promoting that movie. You are never like, oh crap, now I know they lived so i don’t want to see the movie! What a moron. This is an animated kids movie. My kids go crazy every time they see anything that has Wall E on it. I think it is great that they have an actual robot promoting that movie. I wish it would come to my area so my kids could see it. they would just love it! You just seem like a bitter man that has no kids and no life!

  8. Jim says:

    Hey now WOW,

    You obviously took what I wrote far more seriously than I did. For one thing, what you call “grammatical errors,” I call “personal style.”

    However, if you’d like, I can run my next post by you prior to pushing the “publish” button.

    It’s going to be about people with lives structured entirely around the wants and needs of their children accusing childless people of not actually having a life.

    As you pointed out, you see actors whose character died in a movie out promoting their movie. But, for example, you would have never seen (Spoiler Alert!) Charles Foster Kane promoting “Citizen Kane,” just Orson Wells.

    That’s because there is a difference between an actor in a movie and the actual character from the movie. And my point is they were showing us Wall E the character, not the actor, therefore he’s cool!

    It’s a subtle distinction, I’ll grant you, but perhaps you were distracted by your kids going crazy at that exact moment, so you’re forgiven.

    Unless, Wall E is like Santa Claus, and that wasn’t Wall E, but rather one of Wall E’s helpers! Oh crap, I didn’t even think about that until just this moment.

    What a maroon I am!