<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Publishers Crash (and Burn at) SXSW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/</link>
	<description>Chasing the long tail of digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookish Guide to SXSW</title>
		<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/comment-page-1/#comment-29727</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookish Guide to SXSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoper.com/?p=3532#comment-29727</guid>
		<description>[...] alive with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alive with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</title>
		<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/comment-page-1/#comment-29722</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoper.com/?p=3532#comment-29722</guid>
		<description>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the Buzz: SXSW Wants You&#8230;to Vote on Possible Publishing Panels &#124; Publishing Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/comment-page-1/#comment-28072</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s the Buzz: SXSW Wants You&#8230;to Vote on Possible Publishing Panels &#124; Publishing Perspectives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoper.com/?p=3532#comment-28072</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, it looks like publishers are having another go at next year&#8217;s South by Southwest Festival (SXSW) in Austin, Texas next year. The festival is currently accepting panel suggestions for the Interactive conference, and the good news is that a number of panels have been suggested by people in the book industry. You can find a good list of those panels, from Richard Nash and  Kassia Krozser, or browse the list on your own. Plus, you can vote on your favorites. Let&#8217;s hope the book publishing panels in 2010 go better than this year&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, it looks like publishers are having another go at next year&#8217;s South by Southwest Festival (SXSW) in Austin, Texas next year. The festival is currently accepting panel suggestions for the Interactive conference, and the good news is that a number of panels have been suggested by people in the book industry. You can find a good list of those panels, from Richard Nash and  Kassia Krozser, or browse the list on your own. Plus, you can vote on your favorites. Let&#8217;s hope the book publishing panels in 2010 go better than this year&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</title>
		<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/comment-page-1/#comment-27799</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoper.com/?p=3532#comment-27799</guid>
		<description>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://medialoper.com/traditional-publishers-crash-and-burn-at-sxsw/comment-page-1/#comment-27679</link>
		<dc:creator>SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoper.com/?p=3532#comment-27679</guid>
		<description>[...] it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
